You may want to read:
Most parents who have young kids wrestle with the “Santa question” during this time of the year. It is an important issue you can’t avoid since our imaginary and ubiquitous friend never goes away. Since you are asking, I would reframe your argument with another set of questions:
I suppose you could answer the “Santa question” from different points of view. I will use three of the more common categories within Christendom to think about our topic. For simplicity sake, I will use the labels of right, left, and middle and call them as follows:
This Christian collective embraces a separation mindset. The legalist perspective is to separate from the culture, which is not tenable since separation from the culture is impossible. It would be more accurate to say separatists practice selective or convenience separation. A real separatist creates a parallel and autonomous universe, which is not possible, which is why the so-called separatist picks and chooses how he wants to disassociate himself from the culture.
Typically the separatist will have a “list” of dos and don’ts regarding cultural engagement. They gravitate toward those like them and create a sub-culture within the broader culture. It’s the micro within the macro. Usually, their standards (or rules) draw more attention to their anti-cultural worldview rather than the Christ they love. Instead of modeling the Christ-life by blending into the culture, they live counter to the prevailing culture. I understand what they want to do and why they want to do it, but their lives become contradictory, creating extreme asymmetry with the world.
Nobody is a real separatist. Even the Amish have caved to the difficulties and challenges of separating from the world. They live in the world, imbibe from the world, and enjoy many of the world’s benefits. Just like the rest of us, they are participating in God’s world while enjoying that God’s world does not have to be wrong.
This second group on the left typically reacts to the separatists. Often these people are children of separatists who felt suppressed by the extra-biblical rules of their parents. Their separated parents’ lifestyle did not export to them. The children chose another path. Many people in this group are either angry or superior to the separatists. I’m calling it a liberal way here.
The worst-case scenarios are those who tout their freedom as an attitude and lifestyle outside biblical parameters. Rather than the Bible informing their theology, their past experiences are the filter through which they see life: (1) what happened to them, (2) how it did not work, and (3) the wrongness of the separatists. Ironically, they are not free from their past. Their history is their identity, not the gospel when you talk to them.
Their term of choice is grace over legalism, which is often an over-reaction to legalism. It’s hard to appeal to them about obedience, discretion, and sin because they disdain critique. They see your analysis as judgment, harshness, rule-based, and bondage. They talk more about grace and less about sin. Typically, they have weak sin categories because they don’t understand how the doctrine of grace and sin coexist and interact.
This third group works hard for biblical integrity and theological precision. They are not anti-culture or culture-centric. They use the Bible as their guide and filter, hoping to live practically in their culture while engaging it. The biblicist is Biblio-centric. They are not afraid to make practical life decisions and live by them. They evolve, or what the Bible calls progressive sanctification.
They effectively live in the culture, but they guard against crossing biblical guidelines. Their worldview is how to think about their culture while engaging them without being adversely affected by their culture. The biblicist perspective sees no choice but to engage the culture while living in the culture. It is like a fish forced to live in water. The fish cannot alienate himself from the water, though he must refrain from being bloated by the water.
To live biblically in your culture requires courage, discernment, compassion, and discretion. It sounds like, “We are in the culture. Therefore, we must discern how to engage our culture for God’s glory. Rather than trying to separate from them or blindly imbibe their ways, we look to our Savior, hoping to emulate how He lived in, enjoyed, and engaged His culture.”
Lucia and I have spent considerable time thinking about living like Christ in our personal lives, marriage, family, and culture. We do not understand and would not suggest we have arrived. How arrogant. If anything, we are a work in progress. We believe and practice progressive sanctification in a community.
As for the Santa question, we filter this dilemma through a biblicist’s filter. Honestly, the Santa question is not an issue in our home. It is a tertiary matter at best. It does not warrant the scrutiny and time we devote to the essential thing in our house: the gospel.
However, we want to interact with this tertiary question because of the gospel. We cannot keep from thinking about Santa because we are representatives of the gospel. There are no areas in our lives that are outside the gospel’s applications.
The Santa question is primarily about integrity. Can we tell our children something is true when it is not true? Does this mean we should separate from Santa and completely shut our kids off from one of the culture’s most prominent icons? In 2010 we went to Disneyworld. Our children interacted with Mickey Mouse, Pluto, Goofy, Snow White, and twenty-plus other characters they knew through movies and television.
Lucia and I do not have a conscience issue with our children interacting with Disney’s characters, including Daniel Boone and Johnny Tremain. We want them to imagine and explore by interacting with these fictional and non-fictional characters. As our children learned more about our culture when younger, they regularly asked if “this or that” was real. They live in a world and generation that sometimes makes it hard to discern truth from fiction.
“Daddy is that (person, idea, or thing) real” used to be a common question from our children. Questions about mysteries are a privilege for a parent to answer. Younger children are primarily dependent on their parents to guide them in truth. They don’t struggle with fiction, but they regularly ask for our help in knowing the difference between genuine and fake. Lucia and I believe it is our responsibility to teach our children how to discern between right and wrong, true and false. If we do not do this, our culture will eagerly give them their worldview.
With these thoughts in mind, we regularly do three specific things with our children: (1) We teach them to think imaginatively, especially when it comes to God, heaven, and other divinely given things. (2) We teach them to discern between truth and falsehood, right and wrong, and good and evil. (3) We reinforce that we will never, by the grace of God, lie to them on any matter, even Santa Claus.
Truth (faith) is the most significant issue and obstacle in the Bible from our perspective. Truth, trust, hope, belief, confidence, and faith are synonyms, and God calls Christians to live by these things (Romans 1:17). Without faith, we cannot please God (Hebrews 11:6). There is no topic in the Bible more important than truth. Remember the first lie?
One of our most significant parental values centers on the truth. Satan introduced the tension between truth and falsehood to Adam and Eve. God’s truth is the foundation upon which everything else in the world sits. If truth falls, we fall. God calls me to model Him to our children (Ephesians 5:1; 1 Corinthians 11:1; Philippians 4:9). What they see and experience in me gives them their earliest and the most potent interpretive grid of God the Father.
Our children know Santa is not real (I am a separatist), but we enjoy the fictional idea of Santa (I am a liberal). A few years ago, we watched Herbie the Love Bug (circa 1970) and laughed hard as we were cuddled in our bed while enjoying each other, eating popcorn, and watching the movie.
Our children (and yours) are smart enough to enjoy fiction. God gave them the capacity to think outside the box. Fiction does not have to trip them up, and it will not trip them up if you tell them the truth about fiction. They can thoroughly enjoy the idea of our cultural Santa Claus without being told that he is real.
If my Heavenly Father said something was true, only years later I find out it was a lie, I would have a difficult time believing anything else He says to me. We want our children to embrace the truth without doubt or reservation. Teaching them to trust is part of the process of pointing them to Jesus, the One I want them to believe ultimately. I do not want “Santa lies” to unnecessarily trip them up as I teach them about the Savior.
Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth (John 17:17).
Please be free to enjoy Santa if you choose to. Only do so with discernment. If our children can enjoy Mickey Mouse and play with Woody (from Toy Story), I think they can do the same with Santa. We do not want them to have an anti-Santa perspective that puts them in an awkward place to explain their separatist view to their confused non-Christian friends.
If the world chooses confusion or stumbles over our view on something, let Christ confound them. Let Jesus be the stumbling block rather than Santa (1 Corinthians 1:23). I recommend you tell your children the truth. If you have already lied, let them find out from you how and why you lied rather than finding out from their friends. Be honest. They will believe you. Their trust is what you want, right?
Reinforce the importance of truth in your home and your life. Let them know that Jesus is the Truth and that you want to teach them to follow you as you follow Him in His truth (John 14:6; 1 Corinthians 11:1). Thoroughly enjoy your world with discernment, wisdom, and discretion. For freedom, Christ has set you free (Galatians 5:1).
Our most vital need is for financial supporters. If you can help us, will you? We are doing more, and people are asking for more. To keep up, we must hire more while developing the resources to meet the demand.
Rick launched this training network in 2008 to provide life-changing resources that equip Christians to help others. His primary responsibilities are resource creation and leadership development, which he does through speaking, writing, podcasting, and educating.
In 1990 he earned a BA in Theology, and in 1991 he received a BS in Education. In 1993 he was ordained into Christian ministry, and in 2000 he graduated with an MA in Counseling from The Master’s University in Santa Clarita, CA. In 2006 he was recognized as a Fellow of the Association of Certified Biblical Counselors (ACBC).