Listen to the podcast
You may want to read:
Abuse is explainable for unbelievers, but for the Christian marriage, it is inexcusable. Many spouses live in abusive marriages. This chapter will address one of the many questions about abuse: can a Christian spouse divorce her husband because of injury? As with all discussions on abuse, it is impossible to deal with every angle. Abuse is like a giant, angry elephant that we must consume, but we can only eat the behemoth one bite at a time.
In this chapter, I will discuss how the church needs to engage the abusive individual, regardless of gender. I’m presenting a plan to engage, confront, and hopefully restore an abusive marriage partner to God and their spouse. I’m going to take the argument to the question of whether the abused person can divorce their unrepentant spouse. The particulars I’m addressing are:
Let me give you my conclusion first. I believe it is biblically possible for an abused spouse to divorce the abusing spouse while maintaining adherence and honor to God’s Word. Now that you have my bottom line, let me give you my reasoning for such an outcome within a Christian marriage.
Though divorce may be a possible outcome for an abused person, it must be the last link on a chain that has allowed for all other possibilities that could lead to the couple’s reconciliation and restoration to God. In this chapter, I will deal with seven successive links that could end in a marriage’s demise. Here are the steps.
This first link is a subjective assessment question. In the ultimate sense, there is no way to know if a person is a Christian until they stand in heaven and hear their name called. Some people have exhibited ungodly behavior (Galatians 6:1-2) but still seem, upon more assessment and historical data, to be Christians. Other people who have high-profile ministry positions make you genuinely wonder if they were ever born a second time (John 3:7).
A community of wise and courageous believers should give a well-informed opinion on what they observe from both spouses. This critical link is because a person’s salvation is the beginning of any hope for them to change (1 Corinthians 2:14; Galatians 5:22-23). If the abuser is not a Christian, he is powerless to transform in any meaningful and sustaining way. Only the Spirit of God can empower a person to change and stay that way. Without God, you’re asking someone to do what he cannot do successfully.
The other reason for the “salvation discussion” is that a believer cannot take another believer to court (1 Corinthians 6:1). This puzzle is one of the more critical problems in discussing marriage, abuse, and divorce. I am working from the notion that both spouses are believers. They profess to be Christians, and it appears to be that God has imposed Himself on their lives through regeneration (Ephesians 2:8-9).
The next link is trying to discern if abuse is happening. This part is dicey to bring up because even a hint of doubt can throw the genuinely abused person into an emotional tailspin. The thing she needs more than anything else is for someone to believe her. For you to tread carefully here, you must understand this chapter is a “teaching lesson,” not a “counseling session.” To teach counseling, as I am doing here, you cover everything necessary for the counseling student’s equipping, such as this question on whether or not it is abuse. What you learn in a classroom is not parroted verbatim in a counseling office.
The abused person has been manipulated, put down, lied to, devalued, disregarded, and ignored so often that she already doubts herself about the integrity of what she is experiencing. She has been well-trained by her abuser to think what is happening to her is not abuse. If he does succeed with this kind of mastery over her, and if she ever does have the courage to tell someone about the abuse, the worst thing you could do is suggest she is not telling the truth.
If you come in with questions, suspicions, and doubts about her story, she will shut down, crawl back into her hole. In “class,” you must know the importance of discerning whether or not it is abuse, but you cannot point any accusatory words at her in counseling. Your window of opportunity to serve her is brief, and she is guarding it with a hair-trigger.
You want to enter into her narrative (Hebrews 13:3) by understanding the abuse’s extent without blaming. You do this by asking her questions about instances of what happened. You’re not asking because you do not believe her; you’re asking because you want to sufficiently weep with her (Romans 12:15) while learning how to protect her (Romans 8:31). If there are witnesses who are willing to verify what she is saying, it would be helpful to talk to them—if she is okay with you talking to them and the witnesses are not afraid to speak with you.
Is she biblically addressing her guilt, and is she biblically addressing her motives? It would be best to approach these questions like the previous one: I am teaching, not counseling the abused. You never want to talk to the spouse about any potential guilt or improper motives in an accusing way. But you must be aware of how the doctrine of sin can impact lives. Without accusing, you want to discern her motivations and how she has contributed to the marriage dysfunction. Do not tell her these things, but determine them.
Because we live in a culture where living happily ever after in marriage is now a right, there are cases where some spouses want a marriage redo because they are tired of their spouses. Marriage is a long and arduous journey that requires heavy lifting from both partners. The honeymoon wears off, and the difficulties can mount quickly.
Being dissatisfied is not abuse. Not liking your spouse does not qualify either. Regretting your marriage, learning about your husband’s life-dominating sin, or discovering more “happiness” by perusing Facebook marriages is not an excuse for divorce. You must consider carefully and skillfully factor in how the doctrine of sin intersects with a sound theology of suffering when it comes to the realities of abuse. You want to be thorough. I think most abuse victims will be reasonable with what you are doing if you assure them of these two things:
You cannot accuse or suggest she is not telling you the truth. Her husband probably has reminded her how awful and wrong she has been and why she is the primary source of all their problems. Perhaps this illustration will be helpful. Suppose I was in a bank that someone was robbing. In a moment of courage (or brain cramp), I made a lunge for the door, and the robber shot me in the chest.
You are now visiting me in the hospital. That would not be the time to talk to me about my mistakes. Maybe I should not have lunged for the door, but right now, I need your care, not your scrutiny or your “would’ve, should’ve, could’ve” list of best practices during a bank robbery.
If a wife dares to talk to you about abuse, your starting point is that she is telling you the truth. You believe her, bring care to her, and seek to restore the marriage by making a plan to confront her husband. I received this letter from an abused wife and asked her if I could use it for this chapter. She said yes. I’m going to call her Mable. Her letter speaks to what I’m conveying to you. I have received similar letters from husbands with abusive wives.
The struggle I have had is that no person has been able to give me a straight answer to how to protect the wife, long-term, from a man who is considered dangerous. The counsel I received was that divorce is only allowed in cases of adultery and abandonment. At the time, as far as I knew, there was no evidence of infidelity, and he indeed hadn’t abandoned us—at least not physically.
I’m not saying this to cast blame or even to criticize the counsel I received. My pastors were pivotal in teaching me what I needed to know. It was during these years that I learned a sound theology of suffering. It was during the first year of separation that I was able to spend vast quantities of time and energy immersed in Scripture. I don’t regret any of the counsel I received because even the “bad” counsel taught me what I needed to know. It always forced me to continually go back to Scripture for an understanding of what I was experiencing.
I realize this is a problematic issue to address. I also understand that even talking about church discipline and marital abuse runs the risk of giving many people the wrong idea that God “wants us to be happy.” Nevertheless, church discipline is a command, not an option (Matthew 18:15-17). We are to go slowly, always giving the benefit of the doubt when it comes to the one confronted. I believe I have gone as far as I can go, according to Matthew 18. I addressed the issue with my husband first—many, many times. Then I sought counsel from my pastor. Then they attempted to counsel my husband. This process has taken place over several years.
I will freely tell you that my objectivity in this situation is probably all but gone. I struggle with anger at the way my husband twists Scripture to justify his treatment of me. I do not believe allowing this kind of thing to go unabated glorifies the Lord. I think doing nothing gives my husband approval for the sin. My biggest concern is that my husband is not a Christian. How could he be and believe the stuff he says?
I have never looked for a way to end my marriage. Divorce was never my goal. I love my husband. I love being married. I don’t love being married to the husband I love. I’m not feeling pressured. I’m not in a hurry. I want God glorified in whatever happens with my marriage and in my family. But I do think, after a year with no evidence of change; something else needs to happen. As for what that something else should be, I don’t know. This problem is why I won’t make any sudden moves without lots and lots of counsel.
Her letter adequately covers all of my points thus far, while pointing you to what needs to happen next.
The church is God’s community for a situation like the one in which Mable finds herself. The church has no choice but to continue what has been called church discipline/restoration. It is discipline if her husband does not repent; it is restoration if he authentically turns to God. What we have termed “church discipline” begins with the individual Christian and God alone. If a person sins, the Spirit of God will bring conviction to His child about that sin.
The believer will respond to the Spirit’s work and confess (1 John 1:7-10) while developing a plan to remove the evil from his life (Ephesians 4:22-24). Every Christian has this privilege and responsibility. If the Christian does not respond to the Spirit’s work, a friend should come along and address the sin (Proverbs 27:6). If the erring brother does not repent, a more substantial number of caring friends will confront him. When you get into the Matthew 18:15-17 portion of church discipline, you may have to purge the person from the church.
But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of brother if he is guilty of sexual immorality or greed, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or swindler—not even to eat with such a one. For what have I to do with judging outsiders? Is it not those inside the church whom you are to judge? God judges those outside. Purge the evil person from among you (1 Corinthians 5:9-13).
If the church that belongs to Christ will not take care of the body of Christ, it has failed in one of its most significant responsibilities.
After a slow, tedious, demanding, and thorough process in which all of the action items listed have happened, plus all of the things biblically derived from those points, and if the husband does not change, you must remove him from the local body. You treat him as a lost person—someone God did not save, as Jesus talks about in Matthew 18:17. If things deteriorate to this degree, he might not be a believer after all. John talked about that in 1 John 3:4-10.
Everyone who makes a practice of sinning also practices lawlessness; sin is lawlessness. You know that he appeared in order to take away sins, and in him there is no sin. No one who abides in him keeps on sinning; no one who keeps on sinning has either seen him or known him. Little children, let no one deceive you. Whoever practices righteousness is righteous, as he is righteous. Whoever makes a practice of sinning is of the devil, for the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil. No one born of God makes a practice of sinning, for God’s seed abides in him; and he cannot keep on sinning, because he has been born of God. By this it is evident who are the children of God, and who are the children of the devil: whoever does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor is the one who does not love his brother. – John
John is not saying that a person who sins is not a Christian because he acknowledged the possibility of being saved and sinning in 1 John 1:7-10. He is also not talking about a person stuck in a life-dominating sin because Paul addressed that in Galatians 6:1-2. John is talking about a person who “willfully makes a practice of sinning;” he determines that this is what he is going to do, and he will not change no matter how many appeals you make.
This type of person is different from a person who sins, confesses, and seeks forgiveness (1 John 1:7-10) or the person who is caught in a trap and wants out but needs help from Christ’s body (Galatians 6:1-2). A person at “the Matthew 18:17 point” of discipline can be a Christian, but Jesus said that you are to treat him like he is not a Christian.
If the church puts him out of their midst because he is a danger, to whatever degree his sin represents, it stands to reason that his wife, a fellow church member, has the right to entertain a similar response. It’s not reasonable to ask him to stay away from the church body while providing his wife—part of the church body—no recourse to stay away from him. You cannot go to court against a believer, but there is no prohibition in God’s Word that keeps you from engaging unbelievers through the justice system. For example, many spouses have received counsel to ask for a restraining order (RO) to stop their husbands from harassing them.
It is also possible—as I understand these Scriptures—that she can divorce him if that is the right thing to do according to adequate counsel from the church and the careful application of the ideas presented here. If her heart’s attitude is like Mable’s, and if you have weighted all other options, that door is open to her. Some may argue 1 Corinthians 7:13—”If any woman has a husband who is an unbeliever, and he consents to live with her, she should not divorce him.”
It seems that the inference of this passage is about an unbeliever who does not want a divorce, does not want to be a Christian, and does not want to leave his wife. In such a case, he should dwell with his wife, but if he chooses to beat her or abuse her, the wife must follow God’s teachings to keep him from harming her. He does not have the right to break the law. If he did physically harm her, she would not have to wait for the church. She would call the civil authorities to arrest him, acquiring a restraining order, or possibly divorcing him.
Every abuse case must stand on its merit. None of them are the same, which is why you want to weigh each one with many competent counselors. I have not presented a one size fits all way to think about sin in the marriage. Whatever you do, you must do it prayerfully, courageously, and patiently. Initially, the most vital thing is protecting the victims. Once they are secure, you can slow down the process to make sure you’re working with all the facts before proceeding.